Student's critical appraisal on the evaluation of analgesics in laboratory animal verses simulated clinical trail.

Effective feedback is an integral part of medical education in helping the medical students to reach their maximum potential. Without feedback mistakes may go uncorrected which results poor performances of learners as well as tutors. At present teaching learning methodology used in many medical colleges includes lectures, tutorials, practical and occasionally small groups teaching and case discussions. The curriculum of undergraduate medical and dental students of BP Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal is need based, integrated, co mmunity oriented, partially problem based. The practical lessons are an important part of Pharmacology curricula of undergraduate courses. So the aim of this study was to evaluate the student opinion towards animal experimentation as well as simulated clinical trial (SCT) on analgesics in terms of understanding the objectives. To conduct the study a semistructure questionnaire were provided to 2nd years MBBS and BDS students to obtain their view. Of the 164 questionnaires 154 students submitted completed questionnaire. On analysis of the feedback, it was observed that 77.9% students liked animal experiments and most of them wee happy with simulated clinical trial. The majority of the students 74.1% favoured both exercises for improved understanding of the subject and 66.2% agreed the sequential sessions. So the study concludes with the view that sequential sessions of laboratory experiments as well as SCT are required for a rectified learning of Pharmacology.